USPTO serial 85810516
DITTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DITTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Miami Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent A. Friedman
BRENT A. FRIEDMAN BRENT A. FRIEDMAN, P.A.100 SE 2ND ST STE 2950MIAMI, FL 33131-2101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Audio and video recordings featuring music and artistic performances; Computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for allowing the transmission of text messages that include music; Computer hardware and software for processing digital music files; Computer programs for processing digital music files; Computer software featuring musical sound recordings and musical video recordings; Computer software for communicating with users of hand-held computers; Computer software for processing digital music files; Computer software for wireless content delivery; Computer software to enhance the audio-visual capabilities of multimedia applications, namely, for the integration of text, audio, graphics, still images and moving pictures; Computer telephony software; Digital telephone platforms and software; Musical sound recordings; Software for processing images, graphics and text; Speech recognition software; Wireless communication device featuring voice, data and image transmission including voice, text and picture messaging, a video and still image camera, also functional to purchase music, games, video and software applications over the air for downloading to the device | ACTIVE | Dec 15, 2012 |
| 038 | Delivery of digital music by electronic transmission; Delivery of messages by electronic transmission; Electronic message transmission; Electronic messaging; Electronic transmission of mail and messages; Electronic transmission of messages; Electronic transmission of messages and data; Electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone; Instant messaging services; Message sending, receiving and forwarding; Providing e-mail and instant messaging services; Provision of voice short message services (VSMS); Telephone voice messaging services; Text and numeric wireless digital messaging services; Wireless digital messaging services | ACTIVE | Dec 15, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |