USPTO serial 85810919
CALIBURGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDSON, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CALIBURGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grand Cayman, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley J. Walz
BRADLEY J WALZ WINTHROP & WEINSTINE PA225 S 6TH ST3500 CAPELLA TOWERMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant services | PARTIALLY PAID | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2014 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Oct 31, 2014 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2014 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2014 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 29, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| May 23, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 9, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 8, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |