USPTO serial 85813596
INSURGENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INSURGENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill M. Pietrini
JILL M PIETRINI SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP1901 AVENUE OF THE STARSSTE 1600LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-6055Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | providing online computer games, all relating to motion pictures and entertainment concerning motion pictures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |