Drawing for Serial No. 85814250

USPTO serial 85814250

Serial No. 85814250

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 85814250?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Patton

John Patton PATTON LAW GROUP, PLLC100 CRESCENT COURT, SUITE 700DALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Burglar alarms; Electronic door alarms; Alarm monitoring systems; Anti-intrusion alarms; Electronic components of security systems; Motion detectors; Security system components, namely, batteries, motion sensors, cameras, remote controls, magnetic sensors, glass break sensors, computer hardware, wireless control hardware, contact sensors, RFID sensors, sirens, safety lights, power supplies and water sensors; intruder detection systems comprised of battery, motion sensor, remote control, glass break sensor, computer hardware, magnetic contact sensor, RFID sensor, siren and power supply; Downloadable software for managing and monitoring a security system; Motion detector kits comprised of battery, motion sensor, remote control, glass break sensor, computer hardware, magnetic contact sensor, RFID sensor, siren and power supplyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 20, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 20, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 20, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 18, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 18, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 18, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 21, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 1, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 16, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 20, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 15, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2013COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 29, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 15, 2013MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jan 14, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance