Drawing for FOOD NETWORK

USPTO serial 85814350

FOOD NETWORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FOOD NETWORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Catherine E. Maxson

Catherine E. Maxson Davis Wright Tremaine LLP1201 Third AvenueSuite 2200Seattle, WA 98101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Candle lanterns; electric fragrant wax warmers of ceramic or ceramic and metal; electric fragrant wax warmers; electric cooking pots, electric dutch ovens, electric egg broilers and cookers, electric toastersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 7, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 27, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 26, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 22, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 22, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 12, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 9, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 22, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 15, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 24, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 24, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 24, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 12, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 25, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 30, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 10, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 20, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 7, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 7, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 6, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 15, 2013MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jan 14, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance