USPTO serial 85814555
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen D. Replin
Stephen D. Replin THE REPLIN LAW GROUP, LLC1660 S. Albion Street, Suite 1002Denver, CO 80222UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Agave inulin for use as fiber to aid in digestion | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Baked beans; Beverages made from yogurt, namely, yogurt-based beverages; Bottled fruits; Butter; Butter substitutes; Canned fruits and vegetables; Canola oil; Cheese; Cheese spreads; Cranberry sauce; Dairy-based beverages; Dairy-based food beverages; Dairy-based spreads; Dried fruit-based snacks; Drinkable soups; Edible oils and fats; Fruit-based organic food bars; Fruit-based snack food; Fruit-based spreads; Hazelnut spread; Jellies and jams; Margarine; Margarine substitutes; Milk; Mild milk-based beverages with chocolate; Milled flax seeds; Nut butters, namely, peanut, cashew, almond, walnut, pistachio; Oil, namely, vegetable, salad; Olive oil; Organic nut and seed-based snack bars; Peanut butter; Peanut spread; Raisins; Salad oil; Soft cheese; Soup mixes; Soups; Soy-based food bars; Soy-based food beverages; Soy-based snack foods; Soy bean oil; Sunflower oil; Tofu based snacks; Vegetable-based spreads; Vegetable oils | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Mild based beverages with chocolate, namely, chocolate-based beverages; Agave syrup topping; Agave table syrup; Alimentary pasta; Alimentary paste (pasta and noodles); Bakery desserts, Bakery goods; Beverages with a coffee base; Biscuits and bread; Bread and pastry; Breakfast cereals; Brown sugar; Cake mixes; Candies (sweets); Catsup; Cheese flavored snacks, namely, puffed cheese balls; Chocolate; Chocolate syrup; Chocolate-based beverages; Confectionery made of sugar; Cookies and crackers; Cooking sauces; Corn based snack foods; Crystal sugar; Dipping sauces; Dried pasta; Edible sea salt; Flax seed for human consumption; Food condiments consisting primarily of ketchup and salsa; Fresh pasta; Fruit pies; Fruit sauces excluding cranberry sauce and applesauce; Gluten-free bread; Gluten-free pasta; Gummy candies; Honey; Honey for food; Honey substitutes; Inulin for use as a food starch; Mayonnaise; Molasses; Mustard; Natural agave liquid and powder for use as sweeteners; Natural sweetener; Natural brown sugar; Noodles; Oatmeal; Pancake syrup; Pasta; Pasta and noodles; Pasta for soups; Pasta sauce; Pasta shells; Pesto sauce; Picante sauce; Pizza sauce; Protein reduced gluten-free bread; Ready-made sauces; Rice based snack foods; Salad dressing; Salad dressings; Salad dressings containing cream; Scented water for flavoring beverages; Sauces; Sea salt for cooking; Spaghetti; Spaghetti sauce; Sugar; Sugar substitutes; Tomato sauce; Tomato-based salsa; Veggie burger sandwiches; Water ice; White sugar; Yerba Mate; Yogurt covered fruit; Yogurt covered nuts; Yogurt covered pretzels | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2018 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2018 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 4, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 17, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 17, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 27, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 18, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 17, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 27, 2015 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 19, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 3, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |