USPTO serial 85814766
COOKENDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASTRO, GIANCARLO
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COOKENDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
OLD BETHPAGE, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart J Bellus
STEWART J BELLUS COLLARD AND ROE1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576-1614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | COOKING UTENSIL OR ACCESSORY, NAMELY, TWO OR MORE PIECES OF PLASTIC IN THE SHAPE OF BOOKENDS, OR THREE PIECES OF PLASTIC IN THE SHAPE OF TRIANGLE-SHAPED BOOKENDS, FOR USE IN HOLDING OR POSITIONING HORIZONTAL OR FLAT LYING FOODS SUCH AS SANDWICHES OR PIZZA IN A VERTICAL OR UPRIGHT POSITION FOR MORE EFFECTIVE COOKING INSIDE MIRCOWAVE OVENS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |