Drawing for XPLOR

USPTO serial 85814906

XPLOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, JANET H
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with XPLOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elisabeth Roth Escobar

ELISABETH ROTH ESCOBAR MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.10400 FERNWOOD RD DEPT 52923BETHESDA, MD 20817-1102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games, and virtual environments in which users can interact through social games for recreational, leisure or entertainment purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 29, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 21, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 4, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 3, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 29, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 28, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 22, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 22, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 1, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 21, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 19, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 15, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 14, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance