USPTO serial 85815821
ACUITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4665490Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 6, 2015
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ACUITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Suhail Seth
SUHAIL SETH NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP201 17TH ST NW STE 1700ATLANTA, GA 30363-1099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Tinted plastic film for use on windows | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 22, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 21, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2014 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2014 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2014 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2014 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 9, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 8, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |