USPTO serial 85816385
EASY TREATS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4541622Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 3, 2014
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EASY TREATS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Apple Valley, MN
Apple Valley, MN
Apple Valley, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
N. Paul Friederichs
NU TECH FOODS INC15322 GALAXIE AVE STE 203APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Dessert mixes, namely, mixes for making cakes, cookies and brownies | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Nov 21, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2017 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 18, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 20, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |