Drawing for TMT THE MONEY TEAM

USPTO serial 85818468

TMT THE MONEY TEAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLASSER, CARYN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TMT THE MONEY TEAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lauri S. Thompson

LAURI S THOMPSON GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP3773 HOWARD HUGHES PKWYSTE 400NLAS VEGAS, NV 89169-5956

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Online retail store services featuring beverageware, key chains, magnets, postcards, stationery, jewelry, tote bags, knapsacks, statues, ceramics, frames, vases, jewelry boxesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 2, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 1, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 29, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2017EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2017EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 19, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 27, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 13, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 13, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 3, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 2, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 21, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 20, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 13, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 13, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 11, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2015NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2015DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 10, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 5, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 5, 2015DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 5, 2015ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
May 5, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 25, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 30, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 10, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 20, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 20, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 30, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 30, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 30, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 9, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 8, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2014ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2014ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 13, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 10, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 31, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 31, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 31, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 1, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 1, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 1, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 4, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 26, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 11, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance