USPTO serial 85819319
THE DOOR'S ALWAYS OPEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRODY, DANIEL S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE DOOR'S ALWAYS OPEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin S. Costanza
KEVIN S. COSTANZA SEED IP LAW GROUP PLLC701 5TH AVE STE 5400SEATTLE, WA 98104-7064UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Online advertising services for others related to real estate and ancillary goods and services; analytics based on real estate market activity, namely, real estate marketing analysis | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Multi-platform online real estate services, namely, real estate listing services; providing online information related to real estate financing; providing online information related to renters' insurance; real estate consultation; processing rental and lease agreements, namely, arranging of leases and rental agreements for real estate; financial services, namely, assisting others with the completion of real estate financial transactions; providing online information in field of real estate | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing on-line chat rooms for social networking in the field of real estate; providing an on-line forum for real estate | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Providing online background investigation services; monitoring real estate transactions, namely, computer security assurances and administration of digital keys and digital certificates with respect to real estate transactions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Renticity, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Renticity, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named THE DOOR'S ALWAYS OPEN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 2, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 2, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 2, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 7, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 18, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 28, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2013 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 30, 2013 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 30, 2013 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 25, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |