USPTO serial 85819519
VORTEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 13, 2018
- Examiner
- MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with VORTEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montréal, QUEBEC, CA
Montréal, QUEBEC, CA
Montréal, QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Audra Kemp
Audra Kemp Neal & McDevitt, LLC2801 Lakeside Drive, Suite 201Bannockburn, IL 60015United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for simulating the piloting of excavators, bulldozers, earth moving machinery, boom truck cranes, drill rigs, concrete pumps, military tactical vehicles, underwater remotely operated vehicles, robotic vehicles, submarines, cranes, construction vehicles, robotic equipment, underwater vehicles, military vehicles, construction equipment; computer software for simulating the behavior of cables; computer software for simulating nuclear plant operations; computer software for simulating the operation of drilling rigs; simulators in the nature of computer hardware and software-based teaching apparatus, namely, training simulators for simulating the piloting excavators, bulldozers, earth moving machinery, boom truck cranes, drill rigs, concrete pumps, military tactical vehicles, underwater remotely operated vehicles, robotic vehicles, submarines and cranes, training simulators for simulating the piloting of construction vehicles, training simulators for simulating the piloting of construction equipment, training simulators for simulating the piloting of robotic vehicles, training simulators for simulating the piloting of underwater vehicles, training simulators for simulating the piloting of military vehicles, and training simulators for simulating the operation of drilling rigs; custom built computer workstations for use as training simulators comprised primarily of computers, computer monitors, keyboards, electronic display screens, computer joysticks, computer controllers, and operator seats; the foregoing not including simulators for welding, cutting or joining except specifically in subsea simulators | ACTIVE | Nov 27, 2001 |
| 037 | Providing technical support, namely, technical advice concerning the maintenance of simulation software and training simulators in the nature of computer hardware and software-based teaching apparatus; the foregoing not including simulators for welding, cutting or joining except specifically in subsea simulators | ACTIVE | Nov 27, 2001 |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of training simulators in the nature of computer hardware and software-based teaching apparatus; the foregoing not including simulators for welding, cutting or joining except specifically in subsea simulators | ACTIVE | Nov 27, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CMLABS SIMULATIONS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CMLABS SIMULATIONS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CMLABS SIMULATIONS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named VORTEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2025 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Oct 27, 2025 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2024 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2024 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 31, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 13, 2024 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 9, 2018 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2018 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 30, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 28, 2017 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |