Drawing for INSIEME

USPTO serial 85819641

INSIEME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, MICHELLE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INSIEME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Linda M. Goldman, Esq.

LINDA M. GOLDMAN, ESQ. FENWICK & WEST LLP801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041-1990UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer network software, namely, software for management of physical, virtual and cloud networking infrastructures; software for virtualization of computer networks; computer software for use in controlling, securing, accelerating, monitoring and managing computer network traffic; computer hardware; computer network switchesACTIVE—
042Design and development of computer hardware and software; design and development of computer network protocols that facilitate the control of network switchesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 17, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 19, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 13, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2016TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 13, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 13, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 23, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 10, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 24, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 11, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 11, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 24, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 16, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 18, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 12, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 12, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 16, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 13, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 30, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 1, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 1, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 19, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 19, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 30, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 17, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance