Drawing for CRUSH

USPTO serial 85821675

CRUSH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRUSH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David P. Cooper

DAVID P COOPER KOLISCH HARTWELL PC520 SW YAMHILL STSTE 200PORTLAND, OR 97204-1324

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042consulting, website-development and web-hosting services, namely, all for helping schools and school administrations within the K-12 education community to design and implement websites for selling branded products onlineACTIVEDec 31, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2019MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 31, 2019ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 31, 2019EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 17, 2019EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 24, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2019CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
Jan 3, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 3, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 21, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2018PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Dec 14, 2018APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Nov 19, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 17, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 9, 2018GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 9, 2018GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 9, 2018CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 25, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 3, 2018NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 2, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 2, 2018PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 2, 2018PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 2, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 27, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2017CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2017SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 13, 2017IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 13, 2017EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Mar 13, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2017COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2016EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 9, 2016EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 9, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 25, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 10, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 15, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 11, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 11, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 21, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 14, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 11, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 11, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 13, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 11, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 11, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 11, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 14, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 25, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 12, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 18, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 18, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 29, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 18, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance