USPTO serial 85823020
RICHBERRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RICHBERRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary and nutritional supplements; Dietary food supplements; Food supplements; Herbal supplements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |