USPTO serial 85824146
SEMANTIC RFID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 22, 2014
- Examiner
- MANOR, THOMAS M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with SEMANTIC RFID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence D. Graham
Lawrence D. Graham Lowe Graham Jones PLLC1325 Fourth Avenue, Suite 1130Seattle, WA 98101United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Automated systems, namely, software, hardware and communications devices for planning, scheduling, controlling, and monitoring transportation assets and parts thereof; Building security systems comprising software and hardware for providing picture, video, alarm status, building plans, and other information to a remote station; ] Computer application software for mobile devices and controllers, namely, software for RFID data management, sensor management, building and facility management, object tracking, localization, time management and access control; Computer hardware and computer software for retail inventory management, sold as a unit; [ Computer hardware and software system for remotely monitoring environmental conditions and controlling devices within a building, facility, grounds, or designated spatial area; Computer software for communicating with users of hand-held computers; ] Computer software to automate data warehousing; [ Computer software to monitor and control factory manufacturing processes; Downloadable cloud computer software for RFID data management, sensor management, building and facility management, object tracking, localization, time management and access control; Environmentally friendly automation systems, namely, embedded operating systems and pc based software, for monitoring specified conditions and controlling respective innovative devices within a designated area; ] Facilities management software, namely, software to control building environment, access and security systems; [ Factory automation software, namely, software to integrate manufacturing machine operations, track problems and generate production reports; Pattern recognition systems composed of computer chips, computer hardware and software; Radio-frequency identification (RFID) readers; RFID readers ] | ACTIVE | Dec 20, 2012 |
| 042 | Cloud computing featuring software for use in RFID data management, sensor management, building and facility management, object tracking, localization, time management and access control; [ Computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of information management to host computer application software for the purpose of RFID data management, sensor management, building and facility management, object tracking, localization, time management and access control; Computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining information about tracked objects on a global computer network; ] [ Computer software development in the field of RFID, building and facility management, object tracking, localization, time management and access control ] | ACTIVE | Dec 20, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2024 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2024 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 11, 2024 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 11, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 22, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2021 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2021 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 27, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2021 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Apr 15, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 21, 2021 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 14, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2013 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 12, 2013 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 12, 2013 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 12, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |