Drawing for T20 TWENTY TWENTY

USPTO serial 85825192

T20 TWENTY TWENTY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RAPPAPORT, SETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with T20 TWENTY TWENTY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brett A. Garner

Brett A. Garner VENABLE LLP2049 Century Park EastSuite 2100Los Angeles, CA 90067

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHIRTS, SPORTS SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, CYCLING JERSEYS, PANTS, SHORTS, SWEATSHIRTS, SWEATPANTS, JACKETS, WIND VESTS, ARM WARMERS, LEG WARMERS, KNEE WARMERS, TIGHTS, SOCKS, BRAS, SWIMWEAR, GLOVES; HEADWEARACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2015MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 5, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 5, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Mar 25, 2015EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Feb 11, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 11, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 10, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Oct 10, 2014RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Oct 10, 2014CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Oct 7, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Sep 30, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Sep 30, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Apr 11, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 11, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 10, 2013CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Oct 10, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Oct 9, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 8, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 8, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 22, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 22, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 14, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 12, 2013PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Jan 24, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Jan 23, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 19, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance