USPTO serial 85825479
DRAGONOFF TUNES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DRAGONOFF TUNES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Milton, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill Jarvis-Tonus
JILL JARVIS-TONUS BERESKIN & PARR LLPSCOTIA PLAZA, 40 KING STREET WESTTORONTO, ONTARIO, M5H3Y2CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, the operation of a website comprised of a music knowledge game with interactive and social media components relating to music | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |