Drawing for FULL BLAST

USPTO serial 85825718

FULL BLAST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOSID, ROBIN S
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FULL BLAST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Colleen Caissie-Dupuis

328 URQUHART AVENUEc/o IGT Canada Solutions ULCMONCTON, NEW BRUNSWICK, E1H2R6

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Gaming machines, namely, devices which accept a wagerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 2018MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 14, 2018ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 16, 2017GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2017GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2017CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 29, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 1, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 24, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 17, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2016GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2016GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2016CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 8, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 1, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 18, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 18, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2016ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 21, 2015GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2015GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2015CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 17, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 16, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 12, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2015ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2014GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2014GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2014CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 9, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 8, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 3, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 25, 2014ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 8, 2013GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2013GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2013CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 1, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 1, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 26, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 26, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance