USPTO serial 85825835
LIGHTRAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TARCU, CATHERINE L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIGHTRAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cristina N. Rubke
Cristina N. Rubke Shartsis Friese LLPOne Maritime Plaza, 18th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for content capture for computer graphics and gaming applications; computer software for extracting texture maps from images; computer software for special visual effects; computer software plug-ins for creating special visual effects; computer software plug-ins for content capture for computer graphics and gaming applications; computer software plug-ins for extracting texture maps from images; computer software programs for object recognition, imaging, and image analysis for use in computer vision, namely, computer software programs for preprocessing and extracting information from an image for real-time facial recognition and capture of real-world texture maps for use in video surveillance systems, real-time identification of biometric indicators, computer graphics, and gaming; computer software development tools for use in extracting information from an image, image recognition, and image analysis for use in video surveillance systems, real-time identification of biometric indicators, computer graphics, and gaming | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business research in fields of computer vision, imaging, and image analysis; business research in fields of computer vision, imaging, and image analysis all for use in video surveillance systems, real-time identification of biometric indicators, computer graphics, and gaming | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Conducting imaging analysis in the fields of computer vision, technology research and technology conosulting in the field of face recognition | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tandent Vision Science, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Tandent Vision Science, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by TANDENT COMPUTER VISION LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LIGHTRAY
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 26, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 12, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 14, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 20, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 25, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 9, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |