Drawing for GOLDSHIELD

USPTO serial 85826550

GOLDSHIELD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOLDSHIELD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle P. Ciotola

MICHELLE P. CIOTOLA CANTOR COLBURN LLP20 CHURCH ST FL 22HARTFORD, CT 06103-1253UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, training in the field of mobile device management, network security, and network managementACTIVE
042Computer consultation services for mobile device management and network security and management programs; computer technical support services, namely, help desk services; computer consultation, namely, technical support services for emergency response and remediation, in the nature of providing assistance to the end user IT organizations to isolate and remediate technical device security problemsACTIVE
045Computer consultation, namely, security monitoring services for emergency response and remediation, in the nature of providing assistance to the end user IT organizations to isolate and remediate device security problems for security monitoring purposesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 30, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 25, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 27, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 25, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Aug 25, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 25, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 25, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 31, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Dec 31, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 11, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Nov 25, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 22, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 1, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 29, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 29, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 29, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 25, 2013MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Jan 24, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 22, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance