USPTO serial 85828341
BONVIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 23, 2015
- Examiner
- KAJUBI, ELIZABETH N
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BONVIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas I. Rozsa
THOMAS I. ROZSA ROZSA LAW GROUP LC18757 BURBANK BLVD STE 220TARZANA, CA 91356-3346UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | JELLIES, JAMS AND COMPOTES INCLUDING PEANUT BUTTER, CASHEW NUT BUTTER AND PRUNE SPREADS; PRESERVED AND/OR PROCESSED SOYA BEANS FOR FOOD; PRESERVED, DRIED AND COOKED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; EGGS, MILK AND MILK PRODUCTS EXCLUDING ICE CREAM, ICE MILK AND FROZEN YOGURT; EDIBLE OILS AND FATS; SOY DRINK POWDER TO BE MIXED WITH WATER FOR MAKING SOYBEAN MILK | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | COFFEE, TEA, ARTIFICIAL COFFEE; PREPARATIONS MADE FROM CEREAL, NAMELY, ROLLED OATS, RICE, ROLLED WHEAT, CORN MEAL, ROLLED BARLEY, MILLET AS A PROCESSED CEREAL, PROCESSED SORGHUM, PROCESSED TRITICALE, PROCESSED RYE, PROCESSED BUCKWHEAT, AND PROCESSED QUINOA; HONEY, TREACLE; YEASTS; RICE, RICE CAKES AND RICE CRACKERS, CONDIMENTS, NAMELY, SAUCES; SPICES; PLANT BASED EXTRACTS FOR THE HEALTH FOOD INDUSTRIES AND NOT FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES IN THE NATURE OF POWDER, LIQUIDS AND PASTES FOR THE MAKING OF HERB TEA, TEA BASED BEVERAGES AND COFFEE SUBSTITUTES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | FRUIT DRINKS AND FRUIT JUICES INCLUDING PRUNE JUICE; PREPARATIONS FOR MAKING BEVERAGES, NAMELY, FRUIT DRINKS AND SOFT DRINKS; NON-ALCOHOLIC DRINKS, NAMELY, SPORTS DRINKS, BOTTLED WATER WITH ADDITIVES LIKE VITAMINS, FLAVORS AND SWEETENERS; PLANT BASED EXTRACTS FOR THE HEALTH FOOD INDUSTRIES AND NOT FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES, NAMELY, GUARNA BEING PREPARATIONS FOR MAKING BEVERAGES AND ENERGY DRINKS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by G & R GERARDIS PTY LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by G & R GERARDIS PTY LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by G & R GERARDIS PTY LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named BONVIT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 7, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 18, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |