USPTO serial 85828547
LAZZAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LUDEMAN, JESSICA ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LAZZAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; Dairy-based powders for making dairy-based food beverages and shakes; Dairy-based snack foods excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; Edible oils and fats, preserves and pickles; Edible oils and fats, preserves, pickles; Frozen pre-packaged entrees consisting primarily of seafood; Frozen, frosted, preserved, processed, dried, cooked or crystallized fruit and vegetables extracts for use in prepared meals or food; Fruit-based food beverage; Hummus; Hummus chick pea paste; Jams; Jams and marmalades; Jellies; Jellies and jams; Jellies, jams; Marmalades and jams; Meat-based snack foods; Milk curd; Milk solids; Mixes for making broths; Mixes for making soup; Olive oil; Olive oil; Pickled cucumbers; Pickled fruits; Pickled vegetables; Pickles; Potato-based snack foods; Processed stuffed olives; Processed vegetables; Spicy pickles; Tomato paste; Vegetable paste; Vegetable-based snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Bakery desserts; Baking spices; Barbeque sauce; Bars of sweet jellied bean paste (Yohkan); Biryani seasoning paste; Chili paste for use as a seasoning; Chili sauce; Chutney; Chutneys; Cooking sauces; Corn flour; Curry; Curry pastes; Curry powder; Curry sauce; Dessert puddings; Dipping sauces; Egg- and dairy-free mayonnaise; Flavored, sweetened gelatin desserts; Flour for food; Food condiment consisting primarily of ketchup and salsa; Food flavorings; Food flavorings, namely, infused oils, not being essential oils; Food flavourings; Food seasonings; Garlic paste for use as a seasoning; Ginger paste for use as a seasoning; Halva; Honey; Hot sauce; Instant dessert puddings; Instant noodles; Instant pudding mixes; Instant spice blends; Ketchup; Marinade mixes; Marinades; Masala powder and spices; Masala rice for biryani; Mayonnaise; Pasta; Pasta and noodles; Pasta sauce; Pickle relish; Puddings; Qorma seasoning paste; Ready-made sauces; Relish; Rice; Rice and seasoning mix combined in unitary packages; Rice pudding; Rice-based pudding dessert; Rice-based pudding dessert (arroz con leche); Salad dressing; Salad dressings; Sauce mixes; Sauces; Seasoned coating mixtures for foods; Seasoning mixes; Sherbet mixes; Soy sauce; Soy sauce; Spaghetti sauce; Steak sauce; Sweetmeats; Tartar sauce; Tomato sauce; Vermicelli; Wheat flour | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |