USPTO serial 85829620
MYROOMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MYROOMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
N. Ogden, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jared M. Barrett
JARED M BARRETT SEED IP LAW GROUP PLLC701 FIFTH AVENUE SUITE 5400SEATTLE, WA 98104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing online non-downloadable social media software featuring technology that allows users to upload, post, display, stream and manage their online digital content, photographs and videos for sharing with others for social networking purposes; providing online non-downloadable social media software featuring technology that generates and displays a virtual three-dimensional environment for users to upload, post, display, stream and manage their online digital content, photographs and videos for sharing with others for entertainment and social networking purposes; providing online non-downloadable social media software featuring technology that generates and displays a virtual three-dimensional environment for users to upload, post, display, stream and manage their online digital content, photographs, videos, virtual products, services, coupons, promotions for sharing with others for purposes of promoting, marketing, and advertising to users of social networks in the virtual three-dimensional environment; distributed computing platform as a service featuring online non-downloadable social media software in a distributed computing environment allowing users to upload, post, display and stream online digital content, photographs and videos for sharing with others for entertainment and social networking purposes in a virtual three-dimensional environment; computer services, namely, interactive social media hosting services which allow users to upload, post, display and stream online digital content, photographs, videos, virtual products, services, coupons, promotions for sharing with others for entertainment and social networking purposes and for promotion, marketing, and advertising to users of social networks in a virtual three-dimensional environment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |