Drawing for EAGLEEYE

USPTO serial 85829829

EAGLEEYE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EAGLEEYE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John C. Cain

JOHN C. CAIN WONG, CABELLO, LUTSCH, RUTHERFORD & BRUCCULERI, L.20333 SH 249 STE 600HOUSTON, TX 77070UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Cameras; Computer hardware and computer peripheral devices; Computer hardware and software systems for voice and video conferencing and data collaboration; Computer hardware for telecommunications; Computer hardware for videoconferencing; Video camerasACTIVEMay 31, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 29, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 31, 2013MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 31, 2013ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 30, 2013EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 29, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 29, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 9, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 30, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 29, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance