USPTO serial 85830485
OVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, ANDREA P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathleen E. McCarthy
KATHLEEN E. MCCARTHY KING & SPALDING LLP1185 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS FL 35NEW YORK, NY 10036-2686UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Eyeglass cases; sunglasses; musical sound recordings, video recordings, featuring musical performances and audio visual sound recordings featuring musical performances | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Bags, namely, athletic bags, carrying cases, travel bags, leather bags, purses, wallets, back packs, messenger bags; leather goods, namely, wallets, purses, key chains | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, jackets, t-shirts, sweatshirts and baseball caps, vests, tank tops, shirts, sweaters, pullover shirts, polos, turtlenecks, tops, denim shirts, overalls, denim pants, pants, sweat pants, track pants, leggings, shorts, skorts, dresses, skirts, socks, tights, belts, yoga wear, namely, yoga pants and yoga shirts, swimsuits, rainwear; footwear, namely, flip flops, sandals, shoes, boots; outerwear, namely, denim jackets, nylon jackets, leather jackets, nylon pants, scarves, gloves, fleece wear, namely, pullovers, bottoms, vests, scarfs, toques, gloves, mittens, baby sleepers; headwear, namely, ball caps, camp hats, toques; sleepwear, namely, pajamas, blanket sleepers; maternity wear, namely, shirts, pants, shorts, dresses, skirts; baby gear, namely, cloth bibs | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Wholesale and retail store services featuring musical sound recordings, video recordings, audio visual sound recordings, wearing apparel, clothing, footwear, headwear, and related general concert merchandising items | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Broadcasting live music concerts via internet, radio, television and wireless transmission | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of live music concerts; entertainment services in the nature of the development, creation, production and post-production of multimedia entertainment content; entertainment services, namely, providing webcasts in the field of musical performances; entertainment services, namely, an on-going series featuring musical performances, provided through satellite, internet/electronic transmissions, cable television and webcasts, radio broadcasts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by October's Very Own IP Holdings
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named OVO
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 2, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |