USPTO serial 85830934
DUCK DELI MEATS & CHEESES DISTRIBUTED EXCLUSIVELY BY CHENEY BROTHERS, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DUCK DELI MEATS & CHEESES DISTRIBUTED EXCLUSIVELY BY CHENEY BROTHERS, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Riviera Beach, FL
Riviera Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie J. Lott
LESLIE J. LOTT LOTT & FISCHER, PLPO BOX 141098CORAL GABLES, FL 33114-1098UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | ketchup, mustard, horseradish | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cheney Bros., Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cheney Bros., Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named DUCK DELI MEATS & CHEESES DISTRIBUTED EXCLUSIVELY BY CHENEY BROTHERS, INC.
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 12, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 1, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 1, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 31, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 5, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |