USPTO serial 85830999
XPERT TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4408818Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 24, 2013
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, LAURA DAWN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with XPERT TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
STERLING HEIGHTS, MI
MONROEVILLE, PA
Shelby Township, MI
STERLING HEIGHTS, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Spencer W. Romney
Spencer W. Romney Parr Brown Gee & Loveless101 S 200 E#700Salt Lake City, UT 84111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing information technology services, namely, information technology consulting services, installation, maintenance and repair of computer, Internet access, and telephone software, planning, design and management of information technology systems, computer network design for others, design, deployment and management of wireless networks for others, installation, repair and maintenance of computer software, computer technology support services, namely, help desk services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by XPERT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WOLF CONSULTING, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Byrnes, Bradley
- Other trademarks owned by XPERT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named XPERT TECHNOLOGIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2024 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 24, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2020 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2020 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 13, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 26, 2020 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 29, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 22, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 29, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |