USPTO serial 85833710
SOFIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOFIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
King City ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David E. Weslow
DAVID E. WESLOW WILEY REIN LLP1776 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-2304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software in the nature of a mobile social gaming application that is used by individuals for tracking and measuring fitness levels, tracking and measuring personal fitness training and for playing and participating in virtual fitness competitions with and against other users, with and against previously recorded data and with and against artificial intelligence and all of which allow individuals to earn points and rewards | ACTIVE | Jul 16, 2012 |
| 035 | Arranging and conducting incentive reward points programs to promote the sale of goods and services that are the subject matter of the reward programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, incentive reward points programs designed to reward program participants who engage with the platform for the purpose of physical activity, social activity, philanthropic activity, competition, sharing content with friends, challenging and competing against oneself or friends, participating in an event raising money for charity | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, creating an on-line community for registered users to participate in fitness challenges and fitness competitions and to engage in social interactions in the fields of fitness, charitable awareness, charitable fundraising and social awareness | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Online social networking services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SoFit Mobile Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named SOFIT
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 31, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |