USPTO serial 85834316
MAGNESITA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAGNESITA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Moore
THOMAS J MOORE BACON & THOMAS PLLC625 SLATERS LN FL 4ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1169UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | refractory products not primarily of metal, namely, refractory bricks, refractory mixes for patching, lining or repairing high temperature apparatus and repairing the lining for furnaces, refractory furnace patching and repair mixes; and pre-cast refractory shapes | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | providing information via a global computer network on the use of refractory products to construct, maintain and repair refractory apparatus using refractory products; and providing information via a global computer network on the use of mechanical equipment and computer models to construct, maintain and repair refractory installations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 7, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 7, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 7, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 6, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |