USPTO serial 85835011
SIGHTCORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SIGHTCORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. Yates Dowell, III
EDWARD T WHITE LECLAIRRYAN951 EAST BYRD STREETRIVERFRONT PLAZA, EAST TOWERRICHMOND, VA 23219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ASSEMBLING DATA RELATING TO MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS INVOLVING UTILIZATION OF PEOPLE, PROCESSES, PROCEDURES AND TECHNOLOGY; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ASSEMBLING DATA RELATING TO MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR BUSINESS OPERATIONS FOR TRACKING KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS, PROVIDING ACTION AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORTS, PROVIDING REPORTS ON ADHERENCE TO STANDARDS, PROVIDING FINANCIAL AUDITING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR PROVIDING TRAINING PROGRAMS FOR BUSINESSES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR PROVIDING MANAGEMENT OF TRAINING AND AUDITING | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2014 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 9, 2014 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 9, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 9, 2014 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |