USPTO serial 85836935
ALBATROSS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRAZIER, TAMARA G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALBATROSS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Burton S. Ehrlich
BURTON S EHRLICH LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S MICHIGAN AVESTE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604-2508Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumes; eye shadows; skin lotions; eyebrow pencils; cleansing creams; foundations creams; lipsticks; lavender oil; joss sticks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 14, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 14, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |