USPTO serial 85839385
ULTRA STEEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POLLACK, ALISON FRIEDBERG
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ULTRA STEEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hui Chen Shan
Hui Chen Shan Test Rite Products Corp.1900 S. Burgundy PlaceOntario, CA 91761UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | metal hardware, namely, metal door locks; metal padlocks; metal door, window and gate hardware, namely, keys and key cylinders, levers and lever sets, bolts, guards, brackets, latches, knobs, handles, and screws for sale through retail outlets to consumers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 5, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 2, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 24, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 6, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 24, 2014 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 16, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |