Drawing for QUALFX

USPTO serial 85839726

QUALFX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUALFX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lew Hansen

LEW HANSEN SHERIDAN ROSS P.C.1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202-5145UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in a manufacturing environment to monitor electrical and mechanical performance and to enable quality controlACTIVE—
040Manufacturing services for others in the field of mechanical enclosures; Manufacturing services for others in the field of electronics; Manufacturing and assembly of integrated circuits, printed circuit boards, and a wide variety of electronic products for others; Manufacturing electronic and mechanical components to the order and specification of othersACTIVE—
042Quality control services for others; Monitoring of manufacturing processes and inspections of manufactured goods for quality control purposes; Providing quality assurance services in the field of electronics; Developing quality control standards for electronic components and productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 2, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 31, 2016EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 26, 2016EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 26, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 28, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 19, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 19, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 11, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 26, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 26, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 22, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 14, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 25, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 25, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 7, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 5, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 5, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 26, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 1, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 11, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 28, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 20, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 9, 2013UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
May 9, 2013PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2013GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 22, 2013GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 22, 2013CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 18, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance