Drawing for LIPIVAGE

USPTO serial 85839976

LIPIVAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIPIVAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edwin S. Flores

EDWIN S. FLORES CHALKER FLORES, LLP14951 DALLAS PKWY STE 400DALLAS, TX 75254-6859UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical devices, namely, sterile syringes, inserts for syringes, plungers for syringes, cell filters, cellular filtration units, cell culture chambers, and kits for harvesting autologous cells during surgery consisting primarily of sterile syringes, inserts for syringes, plungers for syringes, cell filters, and cell culture chambersABANDONEDAug 1, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2013MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 10, 2013ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 8, 2013EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 19, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 2013MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance