USPTO serial 85841792
V5VSS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with V5VSS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen S. Frank
Karen S. Frank Coblentz Patch Duffy & Bass LLPOne Montgomery Street, Suite 3000San Francisco, CA 94104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical apparatus, namely, a video recording security System that captures Video, Audio, and Data from security cameras onto a hard disk or any type of permanent memory device; Electrical and electronic apparatus, devices and instruments, namely, surveillance video cameras, camera lenses, tilting heads for cameras, mounting devices for cameras, electronic video surveillance installations; Electro optical surveillance and security systems comprising sensors, namely, video cameras, digital cameras, infrared (IR) detectors, motion detectors, radar transducers, sonar transducers, chemical sensing devices, biological sensing devices, global positioning system (GPS) transponders, radio frequency (RF) transmitters, radio frequency (RF) receivers, and computer hardware and computer software for detecting changes, tracking changes, visualization, and database management; Electric and electronic video surveillance installations for industrial, commercial, residential use, including land (vehicles), air (airplanes) and sea transport (boats or ships) utilizing any form of electrical data transport medium such as the use of cellular networks, wireless networks, RF radio systems, satellite networks and internet cloud service technologies to transmit and store video, voice and data content; Computer hardware for IP video surveillance; Closed circuit TV systems for security and surveillance, namely, cameras, switchers, monitors, microphones, and recorders; Camera hardware systems for IP (Internet protocol) video surveillance; Automated self-contained electronic surveillance devices that can be deployed to gather evidence or intelligence in remote locations; Electronic video surveillance products, namely, electronic and electro-mechanical actuator and sensor components of security systems; Equipment for surveillance and controlling any electronic, electro-mechanical actuators or sensors, namely, computer hardware and computer software featuring the use of feature and object shape recognition technologies for monitoring and controlling any electronic, electro-mechanical actuators or sensors; equipment for electronic control, surveillance, remote surveillance and alarm verification using any form of electrical data transport medium such as the use of cellular networks, wireless networks, RF radio systems, satellite networks and internet cloud service technologies to transmit and store video, voice and data content | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |