Drawing for SURGIBOT

USPTO serial 85842842

SURGIBOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SURGIBOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Angela P. Doughty

Angela P. Doughty WARD AND SMITH, P.A.PO BOX 867NEW BERN, NC 28563-0867UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware, software, electrical and optical instruments which facilitate transmission of surgical information between locations via the internet, global computer networks and direct connections through archived medical images and a data storage and retrieval system, namely, a computer laptop, touchscreen, embedded camera, headset for use with computers, microphone, mouse, blank USB flash drive, remote interface for computers and software embedded thereinACTIVE—
010Computerized, powered surgical manipulation system comprised of support arm, control cart, control console, immersive video display, camera image processing equipment, surgical manipulation system software and instructional manuals provided as a unit, patient-side system with multiple arms and motors that use sterile connectors to help drive a full line of resposable tools, namely, laparoscopes, endoscopes, trocars, cannulas, cutters, clamps, elevators, gouges, knives, scope preheaters, light sources, cables and component parts, electrosurgical instruments, electrocautery instruments, tissue and vessel sealing instruments, plasma instruments, laser instruments, ultrasound instruments, lens cleaning, scrub and biopsy brushes, clip appliers and clips, tack appliers and tacks, applicators, ligature carriers, needle holders, clamps, hemostats, graspers, curettes, instrument guides, ligature passing and knotting instruments, needles, retractors, snares, stylets, forceps, dissectors, calipers, scissors, suction and irrigation probes, sterile drapes, hemostats, amputation hooks, osteotomes, saws, retainers, suturing apparatus, measuring tapes, chisels and contractors, files, skin graft expanders, lancets, mallets, pliers, hammers, rasps, spatulas, and strippers; surgical instruments, namely, scalpels, scalpel blades and handles, staplers, tackers, clip appliers, electrocautery tools, forceps, needle holders, guides and drivers, graspers, and kitenersACTIVE—
042Technical and training support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing robotic hardware and computer software problems, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing problems with medical equipment, namely, a robotic, powered surgical manipulation systemACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 24, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 17, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2016EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2016EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 15, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 30, 2015CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2015EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Sep 24, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 17, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 26, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 12, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 12, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 17, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 15, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 15, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 2, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 31, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 7, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 7, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 5, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 17, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 23, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 3, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 15, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 30, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 30, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 30, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 30, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 30, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 24, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 14, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance