Drawing for WOULDN'T IT BE NICE IF

USPTO serial 85847296

WOULDN'T IT BE NICE IF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PARADEWELAI, BENJI YUEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WOULDN'T IT BE NICE IF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Mitnick

DAVID MITNICK DAVID MITNICK P.C.349 5TH AVE STE 529NEW YORK, NY 10016-5019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Compiling of information into computer databases; promotion services, namely, promoting public awareness of the need for open and free dialogue, exchange, and communication about public and private issues; social services, namely, promoting public awareness through communication about charitable, philanthropic, volunteer, public, social and community service and humanitarian activities; association services, namely, promoting public awareness of the need for open and free dialogue, exchange, and communication about public and private issuesACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, creating on-line communities for users to organize groups and events, participate in discussions, and engage in social, business and community networking and information exchange; application service provider featuring software to enable or facilitate the uploading, downloading, streaming, posting, displaying, blogging, linking, sharing or otherwise providing electronic media or information over communication networks; Providing a web site that gives computer users the ability to exchange and share relevant information about news, issues, events, brands, media, corporations, government, and public policy; Providing a web site featuring technology that allows users to share information about the goods and services of others; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring an online computer software platform that allows users raise awareness, dialogue, and communicate about public and private issues or questions, and encourage other users to help change, fix, solve, modify, enhance or resolve such questions or issues through a critical mass of supportACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 23, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 19, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 24, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 4, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 16, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 16, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 2, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 2, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 20, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 20, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance