USPTO serial 85849290
THE SMART PHONE FOR YOUR BUSINESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 17, 2018
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with THE SMART PHONE FOR YOUR BUSINESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Palo Alto, CA
Palo Alto, CA
Sunnyvale, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jefferson F. Scher
Jefferson F. Scher CARR & FERRELL LLP411 Borel Avenue, Suite 603San Mateo, CA 94402United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Gateway routers in the nature of computer control hardware; computer networking hardware; computer network hubs, switches and routers; telephone and audio receivers and transmitters; computer telephony software; computer software for providing voicemail, facsimile, instant messaging, call forwarding, call routing services, call waiting, call identification, and find-me/follow-me services and voice-over Internet protocol communications in the field of telecommunications; computer software for providing transmission and exchange of voice, data, images and graphics in the field of telecommunications; computer hardware; Computer hardware and software for use in connecting telecommunications equipment, telephones, computers, wired and wireless networks; computer hardware and computer software media and multimedia delivery platforms consisting of data transceivers, computer hardware, computer software, wireless networks and gateways, namely, wireless network repeaters, wireless network extenders, wireless network routers, all for transmission and delivery of data; VPN (virtual private network) hardware; VPN (virtual private network) operating software; firewalls comprising computer hardware and computer software for the creation of firewalls; computer hardware and software for use in providing secure remote access solutions; Software for storing, managing and securing information, data, documents, voice and images; call processing software for the transmission of data and voice traffic; audio conferencing software; computer hardware and software for providing in-home PBX (private branch exchange) and PBX for businesses; Computer hardware that enables voice communications, voice-over Internet protocol communications, online communications, voice-over-digital-subscriber line communications, voice mail, call forwarding, caller ID, conferencing, customized phone number directories, call routing services and voice-over digital line communications; none of the aforementioned products are for use on or with smartphones | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telephone communication services; Telecommunications services, namely, providing telephone communication services, facsimile transmission services, and services for call processing, call waiting, PBX; local and long distance telephone services; internet telephony services; telephone voice messaging services; providing telephone conferencing services; network conferencing services; transmission and exchange of voice, data, images and graphics via computer and communications networks; electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording and subsequent transmission of voice messages; teleconferencing services; audio conferencing services; instant messaging; electronic mail and Voice over Internet Protocol (VOIP) communication services; streaming of audio, data and images on the Internet; none of the aforementioned services are for use on or with smartphones | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ooma, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Ooma, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Ooma, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named THE SMART PHONE FOR YOUR BUSINESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2025 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 24, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2024 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 10, 2018 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 7, 2017 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2017 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2016 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 3, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 3, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 5, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 25, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 14, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 9, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |