Drawing for SCOTTS

USPTO serial 85849756

SCOTTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCOTTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen K. Hammond

KAREN K. HAMMOND OMS INVESTMENTS, INC.10250 CONSTELLATION BLVD., SUITE 2800LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Watering timersACTIVE—
011SpigotsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 20, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2016EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 11, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 4, 2016EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 4, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 20, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 14, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 14, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 25, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 16, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 16, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 12, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 29, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 29, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 9, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2014NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 8, 2014DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 3, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 7, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 7, 2014DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2014ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 11, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 17, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 27, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 12, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 12, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 11, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 11, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 11, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 22, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 17, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 17, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 13, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2013MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 18, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance