Drawing for HAXBY COLLECTIVE

USPTO serial 85850702

HAXBY COLLECTIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HSU, FONG
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HAXBY COLLECTIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Melissa K. Dagodag

MELISSA K. DAGODAG THE LAW OFFICES OF MELISSA K. DAGODAG1139 26TH ST APT DSANTA MONICA, CA 90403-4630UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014jewelryACTIVE—
018duffle bagsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2014NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2014DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 24, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 10, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2014COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 16, 2014DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 16, 2014ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 8, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 18, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 26, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 8, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 24, 2013GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 24, 2013GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 24, 2013CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 22, 2013ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 19, 2013PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 10, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 10, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 9, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 8, 2013ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 8, 2013PBSRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Jun 21, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 19, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 4, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 4, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 29, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 18, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance