Drawing for VDI IN ACTION

USPTO serial 85850863

VDI IN ACTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAKAI, ADA HAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VDI IN ACTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jacqueline L. Patt

Jacqueline L. Patt Markery Law LLCP.O. Box 84150Gaithersburg, MD 20883-4150UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer services for desktop virtualization hosting, server virtualization hosting, and application virtualization hosting, namely, technical support services in the nature of remote and on-site infrastructure management services for monitoring, administration and management of public and private computing IT systems comprised of outsourced and co-located servers, desktops, virtual desktops, firewalls, infrastructure systems, data storage systems, and application systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 10, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 10, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 8, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 17, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 17, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 22, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 2, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 19, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 2, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 31, 2013CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
May 31, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 31, 2013GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
May 31, 2013GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
May 31, 2013CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
May 30, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance