USPTO serial 85851306
P. NUTTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 5, 2016
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- —
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with P. NUTTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
David Roberts Food Corporation
E. Oakville, CA
David Roberts Food Corporation
E. Oakville, CA
David Roberts Food Corporation
E. Oakville, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles P. Bacall
Charles P. Bacall VERRILL DANA, LLPOne Portland SquarePORTLAND, ME 04101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Prepared, processed, dried, and roasted peanuts, nuts, and edible seeds; Snack mixes consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisins; dried fruits; dried fruit mixes; dried fruit and nut mixes; Processed nut and edible seed mixes; snack mixes consisting primarily of roasted nuts and peanuts, edible seeds and/or dried fruit; Processed beans and peas; Gift baskets containing processed nuts and processed edible seeds | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | [ Unprocessed peanuts, nuts, edible seeds, and beans ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by David Roberts Food Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by David Roberts Food Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by David Roberts Food Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named P. NUTTY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 1, 2016 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| May 27, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 25, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 5, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2013 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 5, 2013 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 31, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |