USPTO serial 85852010
SKYRANGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAIR, JASON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SKYRANGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Waterloo, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Accessories intended for use with unmanned aerial vehicles, batteries, chargers, power supplies, payloads, control stations, relay stations, systems used to recharge or refuel unmanned aerial vehicles, stations used to recharge or refuel unmanned aerial vehicles, systems used to communicate wirelessly with unmanned aerial vehicles, and stations used to communicate wirelessly with unmanned aerial vehicles, software stored on or intended to be stored on unmanned aerial vehicles, software for controlling unmanned aerial vehicles, software for interfacing with unmanned aerial vehicles, software for communicating with unmanned aerial vehicles, software for interpreting data received from unmanned aerial vehicles, software stored on or intended to be stored on unmanned aerial vehicle parts, software for controlling unmanned aerial vehicle parts, software for interfacing with unmanned aerial vehicle parts, software for interfacing with unmanned aerial vehicle systems, software for communicating with unmanned aerial vehicle parts, software for communicating with unmanned aerial vehicle systems, software for interpreting data received from unmanned aerial vehicle parts, software for interpreting data received from unmanned aerial vehicle systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), unmanned aerial systems (UASs) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |