USPTO serial 85852210
EMBOOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EMBOOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Curt Handley, Esq.
CURT HANDLEY, ESQ. LAW OFFICE OF CURT HANDLEY19540 BUCKINGHAM DR STE 1MOKENA, IL 60448-2432UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Computer file management; Computer-assisted business information and research services; Online advertising via a computer communications network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |