Drawing for LIFE UX HOME

USPTO serial 85854494

LIFE UX HOME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIFE UX HOME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Norm J. Rich

Norm J. Rich FOLEY & LARDNER LLP3000 K STREET, N.W.SIXTH FLOORWASHINGTON, DC 20007-5109

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Mobile phones, cellular phones and smartphones; computer application software for computers, portable computers, mobile phones, cellular phones, smartphones and mobile hand held devices, namely, software for user interface design; computer software for use in controlling, managing and organizing software shortcuts; computer software for desktop utility; computer utility software; computer utility programsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 24, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 24, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 22, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 25, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Feb 25, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 5, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jan 18, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 17, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 31, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 31, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 31, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 31, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jul 22, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jul 22, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 22, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 24, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 24, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 17, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 13, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 13, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 1, 2013GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 1, 2013GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 1, 2013CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 25, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 27, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 24, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance