Drawing for CARDIOTALK

USPTO serial 85854786

CARDIOTALK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ULRICH, NANCY G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARDIOTALK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Teleconferencing, namely, audio and video teleconferencing for the purposes of developing, facilitating and improving communication skills between cardiac health care providers, patients and families of patientsACTIVE
041Educational and training services in the nature of seminars and presentations in the field of cardiac healthcare for the purposes of developing, facilitating and improving communication skills between health care providers, patients and families of patients; Educational and training services in the nature of interviews with physicians to develop, facilitate and improve communication skills between health care providers, patients and families of patients in the field of cardiac healthcare; Providing webcast programs in the field of cardiac healthcare for the purposes of developing, facilitating and improving communication skills between health care providers, patients and families of patientsACTIVE
042Providing a web site that gives computer users in the nature of healthcare providers the ability to upload, view and print documents and printed publications in the field of cardiac healthcareACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 22, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 17, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 16, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jan 21, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jan 21, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 28, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 27, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jul 14, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jul 14, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 14, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 24, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 23, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Feb 23, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jan 8, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jan 8, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 18, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 16, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 16, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 16, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 21, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 26, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Nov 26, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 6, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Oct 21, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 21, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 4, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 20, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 19, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 19, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 27, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Feb 27, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 24, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance