Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 85859579?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/85859579. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns FARMGIRL FLOWERS?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 85859579, the listed owner(s) include: Farmgirl Flowers Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 85859579?

Serial number 85859579 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark FARMGIRL FLOWERS. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of FARMGIRL FLOWERS?

FARMGIRL FLOWERS (85859579) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover FARMGIRL FLOWERS?

The public record lists International Classes: 031. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 85859579

FARMGIRL FLOWERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Feb 25, 2013
Status date: Dec 13, 2017
Registration date: —
Examiner: PHILLIPS, WENDELL SHARMAN
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FARMGIRL FLOWERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Farmgirl Flowers Inc.
San Francisco, CA
Other trademarks owned by Farmgirl Flowers Inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adam R. Bialek

FRANCIS TORRENCE WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN & DICKER525 MARKET STREET#1700SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
031	Live flower arrangements	ACTIVE	Nov 7, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Dec 26, 2017	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Dec 13, 2017	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Dec 13, 2017	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Nov 3, 2017	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
Sep 13, 2017	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Aug 3, 2017	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
Apr 11, 2017	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Apr 11, 2017	EXDR	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED REMANDED	—
May 12, 2015	GNS1	NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED	—
May 12, 2015	GNSF	SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED	—
May 12, 2015	CFRC	SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	—
May 4, 2015	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
May 4, 2015	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 4, 2015	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
May 3, 2015	PGRR	PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED	—
May 2, 2015	NREV	NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED	—
May 1, 2015	APET	ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF	—
Apr 17, 2015	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2015	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Feb 19, 2015	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Feb 19, 2015	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 19, 2015	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 14, 2014	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2014	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2014	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2014	ERFR	TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	—
Jul 8, 2014	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Jul 8, 2014	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jul 8, 2014	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Jan 7, 2014	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Jan 7, 2014	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 7, 2014	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 18, 2013	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Dec 17, 2013	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Dec 17, 2013	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 24, 2013	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 24, 2013	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Jun 17, 2013	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2013	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2013	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2013	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Mar 5, 2013	MPMK	NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED	—
Mar 4, 2013	NWOS	NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED	—
Feb 28, 2013	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—