USPTO serial 85860106
FUTURE PAYTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FUTURE PAYTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Crescent Processing Company, LP
Dallas, TX
FUTURE PAYMENT TECHNOLOGIES, L.P.
DALLAS, TX
FUTURE PAYMENT TECHNOLOGIES, L.P.
DALLAS, TX
Crescent Processing Company, LP
Dallas, TX
FUTURE PAYMENT TECHNOLOGIES, L.P.
DALLAS, TX
FUTURE PAYMENT TECHNOLOGIES, L.P.
DALLAS, TX
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | credit card processing services; credit, debit, check and gift card transaction processing services; online credit reporting for merchants, and transactional services, namely, electronic cash transactions, debit card transactions, and credit card transactions | ABANDONED | — |
| 039 | storage services for archiving electronic data, specifically electronic signature files of customers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Crescent Processing Company, LP
- Other trademarks owned by FUTURE PAYMENT TECHNOLOGIES, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by FUTURE PAYMENT TECHNOLOGIES, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Crescent Processing Company, LP
- Other trademarks owned by FUTURE PAYMENT TECHNOLOGIES, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by FUTURE PAYMENT TECHNOLOGIES, L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named FUTURE PAYTECH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2016 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 5, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 11, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |